Fomapan 400 @ 1600 Fomapan 400 @ 1600 This roll of Fomapan 400 was exposed EI1600 and developed at a +2 stop push. I bought some and tried it and it worked. And to those who want to shoot it at ASA-400 or even faster, I say go for it! Let me start by tell you Im surprised at the cost of film in the UK. . This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. I like this film for his wide gray scale. You can see the loss of highlight at the top of the frame, but there are more shades of grey that are maintained. These days, I primarily shoot 100 Classic, in large part because I use Fomapan a great deal in the testing of vintage cameras Ive repaired or restored, and their limited shutter speeds and apertures make it difficult to properly expose on a bright, sunny day with fast ISO 400 film. Film strips (exposure latitude, base clarity) Rollei ID11, falls ich rckfllig werde, doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger. Except that if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the more expensive film. Compare Ilford HP5 Plus vs Arista EDU Ultra 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action Compare Kodak T-Max 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus. I only used three cassettes of Fomapan 400 in 135 because shot outside I found it quite grainyhowever shots I made indoors under low light in a church and a museum looked really good. It works well in Rollei Low-Speed, Adox FX-39 II, Kodak D-96, Adox Atomal 49, etc. I loaded up my LowePro 400 AW II with my Nikon F100, 12-24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, and 85mm f/1.8 one foggy March morning before striking out through the streets of NYC to shoot some film. If I wanted that I'd use a softar filter. Ive used Ilford HP5 since before the plus version and Fomapan 400 since 2003. November 20, 2019. Deine Erfahrungen beziehen sich vermutlich auf den neuen APX 400. However I still wanted to see whether Fomapan 400 could work for me in any other use cases, and so shot this roll at EI200, one stop overexposed consistently. Its predictable, and has a very classic feeling to it. Filling the Gap Photography & Mental Health. HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. Definitely a characterful film with quirks, and requiring experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what it offers. Mir ist das Ergebnis ein wenig zu krnig. However due to my slow shooting style I didnt have these images ready in any kind of timeframe that would make sense, and have since shot a number of rolls of both, which has given me a little more to talk about. Otherwise Id say its a tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 Plus. Lastly, I converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. Kodak prices, in particular, vary from one supplier to another, but as I write this Analogue Wonderland are selling Fomapan 400 for 4, Tri-X is 9.75 and T-Max 400 is 10.50. If you want some quality on iso 1600 with a iso 400 film use the HP5+ or films like delta 3200 or Tmax 3200 on iso 1600. However it absolutely shines as a character film when over exposed I really do believe it to make more sense as a 200/300ish speed as many online similarly claim. Compare Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press ? The Minolta Maxxum 9 The Perfect Professional 35mm SLR? das wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte. I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. As a truer native 400 speed film it is more practical for someone looking to get the best results at a higher speed. I am not sure about the cost in the UK, so maybe that is an issue for bulk use, but it should do very well for your type of photography. JavaScript is disabled. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Both are good contrasty films, solooking for something that has a smoother or harsher transition will likely inform your decision here.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_14',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); Grain is an interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results. Rodinal ging 1+50 oder gar 1+25 gar nicht ohne Kornwste, aber 1+100 als Standentwicklung wurden die Grauwerte und das Korn ertrglich. These images show how much information is available in these highlights when metered and exposed dead-on, as well as what detail is retained within the shadows and what is lost. And believe me, they are crummy. Give good old Kodak Tri-X a workout. Your link has been automatically embedded. The Kentmere is the real all rounder. It may not display this or other websites correctly. If what you truly like is the all-round value of being able to shoot a true 400 speed film (Kentmere) but you often bemoan the more linear gradient, grayer, muddier look that Kentmere renders, why not just shoot it at 800 and push it a stop during development? Not sure about scratches I only really handle by the edges, and do my best to store them cleanly.Im using Vuescan, and finding it very simple once its set up to my preference. And while it does perform better and is a little more accessible to more people, I still think that the film does an amazing job as a 400-speed film. I like the compositions of your sample images a lot. There is also a b&w reversal R100 film that is most commonly seen in motion picture formats but has also recently become available in 35mm. However, dependable old Tri-X 400 at 320 works for me, especially in 120 size. Find out more about 35mmc here. Upload or insert images from URL. aber eigentlich wird das nix. So by exposing for the shadows, youre basically over exposing it 2-3 stops and thus placing the shadows off the toe and onto the linear part of the film curve? And while you cannot buy D-23, you can buy it in kits from Photographers formulary or mix it up yourself. Is that the new Jane Bond? I recommend having a look at the images found in those to assess the qualities to be found at each different methodology. I do keep a bottle of Rodinal on hand for slower films (Ferrania P30 or Across 100) but DD-X is my go-to for everything else. What a difference! As for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the right is Fomapan. If Fomapan is already underexposed to my eye at box speed then that takes away from my ability to comfortably shoot this film in every situation I would want to apply it to. Right out of the gate, I cant trust it. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Kentmere is not an easy film to shoot. Kodak Tri-X 400 is a classic, and was the first film I started shooting with back in college. ILFORD HP5 PLUS vs Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 in the Moscow Metro with the Mamiya 7II Still life in lockdown: Yashica MAT-124 and Fomapan 200 Creative Trying out night photography with Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 The film meets high requirements for low granularity, good resolving power and good contour sharpness. und deshalb folge ich da den Herstellerangaben der Chemie. Update: May 26, 2021Added a notation that the Fomapan data sheets indicate that the anti-halation dye clears during development, but that it has not been my experience that it does. But how did I come to love Fomapan 400? notfalls kann man es in 1+100 mit einer Standentwicklung versuchen. Lets talk grain. Shooting with Fomapan is a bit like traveling in the past. [] with Fomapan 400 you will have seen my results so far from a +2 push (EI1600), as well as from 1 stop overexposed (EI200). I still prefer Tri-X but its a Can you talk about what developers you used? less forgiving) than HP-5 or Delta 400. HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. In their world, it was imperative to get the shot (a few were still using 45 press cameras) so each step of the process carried equal weight: exposure, developing, printing. Ill have to try it now; thanks for the recommendation! Kentmere 400, metered for the mid-tone. However the overall effect is actually quite muddy, and unpleasing to my eye, whereas the Fomapan in the same condition is undeniably less detailed, but results in a nicer image (in my opinion).if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_11',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); Kentmere 400, exposed for the dappled light. You must log in or register to reply here. I found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400. Some have noted that the foma offering doesnt perform well at box speed, whereas there seems to be a fair amount of confidence in the Kentmere film working at 400. Maybe it likes really high contrast scenes to begin with.though in 120 it is a nice film as the grain just isn't so noticeable. If you need a budget film, Kentmere is your best choice. For example a roll of medium format will cost you less than 5$. What I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability. Definitely worth the effort but definitely to save for the summer! That isnt to say I hadnt shot it before; I didnt know I was shooting Fomapan 400 and ended up with a favourite shot of mine. I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. As a winter/autumn all rounder the Kentmere is serving me well, and Fomapan as a high-light film makes a lot of sense. Thank you Daniel! Order and structure, vs a more random pattern of sizes. I quit shooting Fomapan 400 because it was so scratch prone for me.Also, whats your Plustek workflow like Im thinking of ditching silverfast for vuescan, Im hearing vuescan makes for more neutral images because silverfast always wants to employ negafix profiles and rubbish like that (half the films I shoot dont even have a negafix profile). 3 Retropan 320 Shot through Franka Sollida II. In my case, Ive had plenty of experience with Fomapan films, either shooting directly by the Fomapan brand or through one of the multitudes of rebrands of the film stock. schrfe war nie ein Problem. ob es der neue oder der alte APX400 war? Ive always liked the look Ive been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X. Wenn ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76. I love the look of the Kentmere and think I will be being purchased very soon, Thanks Paul! I like the old-fashioned look of Foma films, here Fomapan 200 Creative: Camera: Mamiya C330 Professional. So which is the better film? Youre working in the profession, and Im a happily retired photo educator. It provides a grittier look than other Kodak films (specifically T-Max 400). Update: December 30, 2020While keeping the original pricing at the time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020. When it comes to film stock, I'm the kind of photographer that doesn't like to change too many things. I think both films perform fantastically at rendering sharpness into their frames. While Fomapan is still about the least expensive 120 film you can get, its price advantage over arguably better films has eroded since I initially wrote this review. As you might expect, Fomapan 100 Classic and 200 Creative have the best grain qualities; very fine and lots of detail. Fibonawak 8 mo. dringend abraten kann ich vom Foma400 in Rodinal. Es bleibt noch der robuste HP5, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. Enter ? One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. Kentmere 400, exposed for the interior of the car. Review | Kentmere 400 vs. Tri-X vs. HP5 Plus. I get where you are coming from. Mixing the ID-11 and waiting 24 hours to use it was getting old. Press?? Wie ist der Fomapan qualitativ einzuordnen und wie wirkt er in Rodinal? Notify me of follow-up comments by email. My previous pushing experiences with 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for their excellent latitude. Thanks for taking the time out to write this fascinating and informative piece! Fomapan 400 is one of those polarising films, either you love it or hate it, and even those who love the film have mixed opinions. Many feel that it is not a true 400-speed film, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film. in Compard R09 Spezial. totally agree with the article. Thanks Peter!I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan. Ill tweak things in time and see if anything can be made to work better for me, but for now these are my opinions on each emulsion! I bought a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure at f16. May not be true full blown infrared like Kodak hie but is good enough for me, considering there isn't a whole lot of choice. Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. With some loaders there is no actual gate, just a labyrinth which prevents the light from entering more than an inch or so. Noticeable halation. Thanks John! sowohl Altbestnde APX400TS von 1996 (oder so) als auch frische Versandware habe ich so verarbeitet. Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range. Bisher ging ich eher von ASA 320 aus. 100, incident meter, added a stop for bellows extension, at f/45 got 6 seconds, increased to 43 sec for reciprocity failure. Again, much of that comes down to personal taste, and what you want from your photographs. je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch. Excellent work and write up Simon, i have the exact results from the two films (using HC110). Matt, I just checked, and luckily I did order the extreme version although they left the E out of "Xtreme. Theres any number of things I could try. 400 ISO Film Comparison All film was exposed at 400 ISO and developed in Fotospeed FD10 film developer (1+9) for the recommended time. I think the example shots in this article demonstrate this well.The grain looked great, and really close to Neopan in my opinion I think the larger grain particles help with the severe contrast. Thanks! Exposure: 1/500 @ F5.6 (Y2 filter and rubber lens hood) Film: Fomapan 200 Creative dev. Pop in a blues CD and Im in the zone. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? To me, the film seems muddy. (meine Frau sagt ja, das sei alles nur Voodoo und dass man das mit dem Kippen auch getrost bleiben lassen oder komplett bertreiben kann. I process this through Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms of correcting the scan, not altering. Simon, These are great! ich vermute aber, dass ich das wild gemixt habe. Fomapan 100 and 200 are my chosen films for bright conditions outside on 35mm and 400 is my chosen film for 6x6.It's just not great for 35mm nor is it very adaptable to different light conditions.in my experience. But for some, $20 is a big deal. Find out more about 35mmc here. allerdings wurden die Negative dann auch recht dicht- gerade so, wie ich sie fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige. As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. But in all instances I shot at ISO320. Die etwas strkere Krnung nehme ich gerne in Kauf. I chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky. Most of my serious stuff I would not use 35mm for. But the real issue for me is that I am about to try bulk loading for the first time, so there is a possibility that I will lose it all. vermutlich kommst du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus. einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der Film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr. You are using an out of date browser. You can post now and register later. Ich mchte einen klassischen Film verwenden, die Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus. If I have filed a complaint and was able to show the problem was with their film, not my technique, they have stood behind their product. It will also mean that I can make a few comparisons to other, higher end 400 speed films, as they fill roughly the same space. The detail of well exposed for highlights on Fomapan is less refined, and sometimes seem a little harsh even when Im certain they were correctly exposed for. roll of Fomapan 400 and bought a 100ft. Here are a few examples of shots Ive taken with Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative, and 100 Classic. Kentmere 400 is probably the film for you. Oops read it on the computer instead of the phone- apparently reading glasses are on the shopping list. You cant throw any developer at Fomapan 400 and expect pleasing results. 4 Rollei Retro 400RPX Shot through Pentacon Six TL. Some people love it, some hate it. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. I started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I shot. I have been using Kentmere 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper (cheapest?)